ATCMonitor.com Discussion Forum
 

Go Back   ATCMonitor.com > Air Traffic Control Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-13-2007, 11:20 AM
gatorbuc99's Avatar
gatorbuc99 gatorbuc99 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 53
Send a message via AIM to gatorbuc99
Default Arrivals...

Hey, anyone know what the deal is with the RNAV STARS being, seemingly down for the past 2 weeks or so? They're filing WHINZ1, RMG3, LGC1, and SINCA3 instead of FLCON2, ERLIN4, HONIE4, and CANUK5, respectively. I dunno any dispatchers that'd be able to help me answer the question, and after a flight last week i asked an ASA Skipper what the deal was and he went rambling on/i wasn't paying attention..so i got nothing outta that. Anyone know what's up?
__________________
Blue Skies, Tailwinds
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-21-2008, 03:26 PM
gatorbuc99's Avatar
gatorbuc99 gatorbuc99 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 53
Send a message via AIM to gatorbuc99
Default

Ok, now that these are back up, i thought i'd bring this thread back up. It seems now that the aircraft are given "descend via the arrival" instructions, the workload...at least as much as i can tell by the # of transmissions...is lessened. Obviously, the approach controller is still monitoring for seperation, but IMO seems like the workload is lessened.

My question is this: what is it about these revisions that allows the "descend via" instructions to be used, as opposed to be before, when a/c were given vectors from the 40 mile crossing restriction to turning downwind, as well as altitudes and speed? Now these are all flown per the arrival (note, of course, that these restrictions and instructions can be overruled by the approach controller)
__________________
Blue Skies, Tailwinds
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-21-2008, 03:52 PM
seven's Avatar
seven seven is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 97
Default

Previous approach plate instructions were "expect to cross xxx at xxx...etc". The new revision states "cross xxx at xxx". ATC can now clear aircraft to fly the RNAV STAR as published, and monitor the operation.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-21-2008, 04:53 PM
gatorbuc99's Avatar
gatorbuc99 gatorbuc99 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 53
Send a message via AIM to gatorbuc99
Default

Ahh, i see...thank you sir. Is this the prefered method/better/more efficient from your side of the fence, Mr. Seven? I know, only from online atc sites, nothing official, that this procedure is used at Vegas, dunno about any other terminal areas. I imagine this is something that's a step in the right direction, from your perspective?
__________________
Blue Skies, Tailwinds
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-22-2008, 08:06 AM
seven's Avatar
seven seven is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 97
Default

Unfortunately, as a center controller, I can't even use it. My job is to line them up, separate them, and hand them off to approach control at 14,000 or less depending on the airport landing configuration at the time. It does reduce phraseology on the frequency (a good thing), but I can imagine that my brothers and sisters at approach control cross their fingers hoping the pilot/s fly the procedure exactly as published. It appears to be the first step in turning ATC into a monitoring agency...7...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-22-2008, 12:18 PM
admin's Avatar
admin admin is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 246
Default

hey seven which Area do you work in down at ZTL? do you know Spike?
__________________
Steve, ATCMonitor.com Administrator
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-22-2008, 07:50 PM
seven's Avatar
seven seven is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 97
Default

I know Spike. Tattoo across the neck. I used to work with his brother in Area 4 before he retired last year...7...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-19-2008, 05:58 PM
gatorbuc99's Avatar
gatorbuc99 gatorbuc99 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 53
Send a message via AIM to gatorbuc99
Default

Seven, any reason why the "descend via" procedures have been suspended for a while now? That didn't last very long.
__________________
Blue Skies, Tailwinds
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-01-2008, 10:09 AM
seven's Avatar
seven seven is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 97
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gatorbuc99 View Post
Seven, any reason why the "descend via" procedures have been suspended for a while now? That didn't last very long.
That's a question for Approach Control...I'll look into it for you...7...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-07-2008, 06:43 PM
ATCer ATCer is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 13
Default

Part of the reason the procedures were suspended was due to the fact the pilots were having a tough time descending and meeting the speed restrictions.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0 © 2005, Crawlability, Inc.
ATCMonitor.com is owned and operated by Creative NetVentures, Inc. Atlanta, GA USA

©2008 ATCMonitor.com, All Rights Reserved